# The Uncertain Future of Twitter: Is Elon Musk's Leadership Enough?
Written on
Chapter 1: A Shift in Social Media Landscape
Not too long ago, I found myself using a Blackberry, snapping photos with a Kodak camera, and proudly carrying a Blockbuster membership card. If current trends persist, we might soon discuss Twitter (now rebranded as X) in a similar light, attributing its decline to Elon Musk. Indeed, X could potentially fade into irrelevance, much like Blackberry, Kodak, and Blockbuster.
In this new chapter of Twitter, a single individual dictates the rules, with verified accounts now available for purchase. This era showcases Musk's unpredictable behavior, where he candidly shares his political opinions and encourages advertisers who are displeased with his actions to seek alternatives—albeit with more colorful language than I care to use here.
While it's challenging to drive a popular social platform into the ground, Musk appears to be making a concerted effort. Over the past year, several notable changes have taken place: Twitter has undergone a rebranding to "X," replacing its iconic bird logo with a stark black-and-white X. Marketing expert Scott Galloway from NYU Stern School of Business estimates this rebranding has led to a staggering loss in brand value, anywhere from $4 billion to $20 billion. Critics argue that this shift has sacrificed valuable brand equity and global recognition that took years to cultivate.
Additionally, Musk has laid off over 6,000 employees, although the precise number remains unclear. These layoffs have adversely impacted the platform, leading to outages, the reinstatement of previously banned accounts, reduced content moderation, and a significant decline in advertising revenue.
As Musk implements his vision, three potential competitors—Threads, Bluesky, and Mastodon—are lurking in the background, hoping to fill the void left by Twitter. However, none of these platforms have yet proven capable of capturing the microblogging market.
It's worth noting that Twitter isn't the first major brand to face decline. Other well-known companies like Blockbuster, Blackberry, and Kodak have faltered in the past due to their leadership's failure to adapt to evolving consumer preferences and market dynamics.
Section 1.1: Learning from Past Failures
The declines of Blockbuster, Blackberry, and Kodak serve as cautionary tales. John Antioco, the last CEO of Blockbuster, missed a pivotal opportunity to acquire Netflix for just $50 million, underestimating the future of online streaming. This oversight ultimately contributed to Blockbuster's demise as Netflix became a dominant force in home entertainment.
Similarly, Blackberry's co-CEOs, Mike Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie, failed to foresee the shift toward touchscreen smartphones. Despite the growing popularity of touchscreens, they clung to physical keyboards and resisted allowing app development within their ecosystem, which led to Blackberry's downfall.
Kodak faced a similar fate under the leadership of CEO George Fisher, who prioritized film market share over the burgeoning digital camera trend. His reluctance to pivot towards digital photography allowed competitors to capture the market, leading to Kodak's decline.
These former CEOs should have responded more proactively to changing market conditions and consumer demands. They needed to invest in attracting and retaining top talent to help navigate these shifts.
Subsection 1.1.1: Why Elon Musk May Be the Wrong Fit
Given the historical examples of failure, I believe Elon Musk may not be the right person to steer Twitter (now X) forward. While he possesses a strong grasp of technology, his understanding of human dynamics seems limited. Leading a social platform requires a nuanced comprehension of diverse user experiences and perspectives. His tendency to make unilateral decisions reflects a lack of empathy crucial for guiding a social network.
Musk's takeover of Twitter included significant layoffs and a reduction in server capacity to cut costs. He also directed engineers to find ways to slash infrastructure expenses by $1 billion, resulting in server failures and crashes during high-traffic events, such as the livestream announcement by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis regarding his presidential run.
Musk's erratic behavior is not surprising; he often makes hasty decisions with unforeseen consequences. His frequent alterations to Twitter's policies and features have sown confusion and instability among users and staff.
Section 1.2: Controversial Decisions and Their Impact
Critics have raised concerns regarding Musk's approach to free speech, which often translates into minimal content moderation. While this stance might attract some users, it raises alarms about an uptick in hate speech and misinformation. Notably, Musk recently reinstated the account of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who had been banned in 2018 for promoting false claims about tragic events like the Sandy Hook shooting.
Jones asserted that the Sandy Hook tragedy was staged to promote gun control, a narrative that persisted until a Texas court ordered him to pay $49 million in damages for spreading falsehoods.
Musk's confrontational leadership style has alienated many long-time users and Twitter employees, leading to diminished morale and eroding brand trust—factors that could hinder Twitter's ability to attract and retain the talent necessary for its longevity.
Chapter 2: The Future of X
As the landscape continues to evolve, the question remains: Will Twitter (now X) endure, or is its demise imminent within the next 24 months?
Has Elon Musk Finally Destroyed Twitter?
This video explores the implications of Musk's decisions on Twitter's future and public perception.
Jimmy Wales: Elon Musk is Making Twitter Vulnerable to Collapse
In this discussion, Wales examines the potential risks Twitter faces under Musk's leadership and what it could mean for the platform's future.