Understanding Financial Traps: How Brands Exploit Consumers
Written on
Chapter 1: The Deceptive Strategies of Major Brands
Many companies employ clever tactics to maximize their profits at your expense. It's essential to recognize these strategies to make smarter purchasing decisions.
When you consider making a purchase, it's crucial to stick to the essentials and pay only with cash you currently possess.
Brands like airlines, car manufacturers, and cosmetic companies often entice consumers with seemingly attractive offers that can lead to overspending. For example, when purchasing a drink at a coffee shop like McDonald's, you might notice three sizes: small, medium, and large. The medium often costs nearly the same as the large, which can trick consumers into opting for the larger size—believing it’s a better deal.
Why do so many people choose the large drink when refills are free? It baffles me. Personally, I would always select the small, less expensive option and take advantage of the free refills. Why pay an extra $2 for the same drink?
The concept at play here is known as the "decoy effect." The presence of the medium cup, which is pricier and less appealing, nudges customers towards the large cup, while the small option is the most rational choice.
Consider booking flights:
- Flight A costs $400 with a 60-minute layover.
- Flight B is $330 with a 150-minute layover.
- Flight C is $435 with a 60-minute layover.
In this scenario, most travelers might select Flight A, drawn to its shorter layover despite it being pricier than Flight B. However, I would opt for Flight B, as I enjoy exploring airport bookstores and sometimes visiting lounges while waiting.
Now, let’s examine a different set of flights:
- Flight A: $400 with a 60-minute layover.
- Flight B: $330 with a 150-minute layover.
- Flight C: $330 with a 195-minute layover.
In this instance, many individuals now lean towards Flight B, even though the cost and layover time remain unchanged. The introduction of Flight C alters perceptions, making Flight B appear more appealing despite its longer wait. This illustrates how the arrangement of choices can significantly influence our decisions.
The decoy, or "bait," in both scenarios plays a critical role. Research on decision-making indicates that well-crafted options can sway opinions significantly, sometimes by as much as 40%. This demonstrates how easily we can be influenced by the way choices are presented.
The psychology behind this phenomenon remains unclear. However, it suggests that the comparison with the decoy provides a rationale for an otherwise arbitrary choice. When comparing only two options, it can be challenging to assess the true value of waiting time. The presence of a clearly inferior choice gives consumers a justification for their decisions.
This behavior pattern is well-documented across various markets, including real estate, beer, insurance, and smartphones. An unattractive third option can shift preferences between the other two choices.
For example, why would one choose a moderately priced Japanese car when the luxury German model seems to offer significantly more for just a few thousand dollars more?
The "bait-and-switch" strategy is also evident in subscriptions. The Economist offers a digital subscription for $59, a print subscription for $125, and a combined print and online version for $125. The print-only option is clearly less advantageous, yet its presence makes the combined offer seem more appealing.
When only two choices were available, readers were 52% more inclined to select the cheaper option. The introduction of a third, less appealing choice led to a preference for the higher-priced option.
This lure effect is prevalent in high-end product sales, where a less desirable option is strategically introduced to enhance the attractiveness of the remaining options. This technique is also observed in cinema concession stands—where a small popcorn priced at €4, a medium at €5.50, and a large at €6 often leads customers to purchase the large, despite the availability of free refills.
Additionally, combo meals at fast-food chains like McDonald's or Burger King illustrate this tactic, as they bundle items together at a discount—even if one of the items isn't desired.
Ultimately, it's crucial to be mindful of spending without letting it consume your thoughts.
Join over 1,200 individuals subscribing to my free content on Substack—it’s completely free!
This article serves an informational purpose only and should not be seen as financial or legal advice. Always consult a financial professional before making significant financial decisions.
Chapter 2: The Psychological Manipulation of Choices
In this video, titled "Excel 2019 in Practice Ch 2 Guided Project 2 3," you’ll discover practical applications of Excel skills that can enhance your financial decision-making.